Entire industries are reeling — airlines and automakers most prominent among them — and gas prices have emerged as an important issue in the presidential campaign.
Over the last 25 years, opportunities to head off the current crisis were ignored, missed or deliberately blocked, according to analysts, politicians and veterans of the oil and automobile industries. What’s more, for all the surprise at just how high oil prices have climbed, and fears for the future, this is one crisis we were warned about. Ever since the oil shortages of the 1970s, one report after another has cautioned against America’s oil addiction.
Where did we go wrong? In large measures the source of trouble may be seen in our own driveways. Americans are now and have been for years obsessed with large vehicles.
Nearly 70 percent of the 21 million barrels of oil the United States consumes every day goes for transportation, with the bulk of that burned by individual driversFor many years low cost gasoline was part of American culture. We built houses far from centers of business and continued to drive everywhere we wished to go. Today we are paying the price of our neglect.
In 1975 the first corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards were passed.
LARGELY as a result, oil consumption in 1990 totaled 16.9 million barrels, basically on a par with the 17 million barrels consumed in 1980, even as the economy grew substantially.A proposed revision of the CAFE standards to raise the average to 40 miles per gallon failed.
Amid furious opposition from Detroit, liberal Democrats from automaking states, like Carl Levin of Michigan, joined conservative Republicans like Jesse Helms of North Carolina to block new CAFE standardsThe argument at the time included automakers responding to public demand. People bought more larger vehicles instead of smaller, more fuel efficient vehicles. I'd argue this was in large part due to advertising pressures as automakers made the larger vehicles seem more attractive and macho. The better profit margins on larger vehicles (especially SUV's) made the pressure on automakers even more decisive.
Since the 1970's
global consumption [of oil] has taken off, rising to 85.2 million barrels a day last year from 76.3 million in 2000.
BY 2001, oil prices were slowly creeping up, but few seemed to notice, perhaps because the march was slow and steady.But the handwriting was on the wall for those willing to take notice. The automakers missed the call and continued to build and market their profitable gas guzzlers.
Now even politician regret their previous stance on CAFE standards.
...onetime CAFE opponents like Mr. [Mike] Castle [R-DE] now say they wish that Congress had acted sooner.Nice to see him on the right page for a change, but now is much too late.
The crisis is upon us today. The pain of the current market will not ease any time soon. Solutions lie in the distant past. Today we must face the situation and look for long term solutions.
“It’s a shame we’re doing this now instead of 10 or 20 years ago,” says Mr. Castle, who supported the legislation last year.But where was he in 2001 when he voted against raising CAFE? Hindsight is wonderful but today we need honest foresight in Congress.
Solutions are not going to be found easily found. Foreign car makers are much better positioned to take advantage of the rise in gasoline prices and the changing demand of American consumers. Detroit is seeing the profit margins of large vehicles dropping faster than the companies are able to respond. The Chrysler plant here in Delaware is closing for an 8 week period this summer to retool for a pair of hybrid vehicles. The entire American auto industry must move as fast as possible to produce smaller, more fuel efficient vehicles.
Our government needs to invest in research and development to insure technological advance into the future. The current crisis is one more warning sign about a future we must face. Our society must take a look at housing development patterns. We must begin to improve our mass transit opportunities. We can no longer afford our oil addiction.
The pain of today is not to be relieved any time soon. We must demand accountability and truth from our elected officials. We must insure a future for our children and our grandchildren by moving to renewable energy sources and we must make the move very soon. Bluewater Wind will supply a small fraction of our electricity. We need a great deal more resources like that. We must move to electric cars or to hydrogen powered vehicles. There is much work to be done. If we fail to move today we stand to lose much more in the future.
Together we can face this situation. Americans have shown themselves to be resourceful and flexible over all these many years. We can face the issues of today if we stand together and take action. We stand together or we fall apart.
Peace.



![[PDA - Pledge For Peace - Sign the Petition.]](http://pdamerica.org/images/ads/P4P_button.jpg)

7 comments:
I fear the pain of today may pale in comparison with the pain of tomorrow as we see oil prices continue to rise. It is my hope we find ways to ease that pain before too many suffer far too much in the coming winter months. How we will fare depends on choices made today. We must act very quickly and we must be decisive in our actions.
Peace.
Sorry, but I have to argue with you on two points. First, the NYT does not write fine articles. It is a worthless rag, a piece of congealed scum. You seem to forget that the NYt helped lie us into war, withheld information about Bush's Fisa lawbreaking until after the election, etc.. I can only ask, but I ask you to please NEVER cite the Times in flattering terms.
Secondly, I think the reference to 25 years is vile and dispicable. Awareness in America of the need for alternative energy goes back AT LEAST as far as Carter on the PRESIDENTIAL level. Do you not get it? That's no minor little journalistic error. It's propaganda. They don't want to validate Carter, nor dop they want to admit that America was aware of the problem on the highest lever for AT LEAST 30 years.
This is the most disappointing article by you I have ever read. I ask you to stop making excuses for the b8ast*ards who have been running this country into the ground. They are scum. How don't care how nice they are in person and how well they shake hands and how charming their children are and how well they make conversation at a cocktail party. That's all learned social behavior,learned for the sake of political advancement. The fact is, they are scum who have destroyed our country knowingly.
Yes. Knowingly. Again, at the very least since Carter this country has known on the highest level that we could not continue to depend on Petroleum. What the politicos and corporatistas have done has been inexcusable and needs to be attacked as such, with unrelenting virulence. There's no room for Mr. Nice Guy in this fight.
I make no excuses for anyone today. The NYT is not perfect by any means. Yet there are enough good points in the article today to make the basis for my argument.
The problem goes back way more than 25 or even 50 years to the origins of urban sprawl after WWII. We are facing a crisis of epic proportions. We are wasting time arguing minor points about how long the problem did or did not exist.
The issue today is solutions. We need long term resolution and not more ineffective rhetoric from any side.
Peace.
But you ARE making excuses for the NYT when you cite it's 'fine' article. The very referece in the article to 25 years is the opposite of fine, because it's a despicable lie. Awareness on a presidential level goes back at least 30 years and that means society awareness goes back much furhter.
This is no picayune point. For one thing, it contributes to the demonization of Carter, the refusal by the 'serious people' to recognize that he was write about many things, ABOUT THE MOST IMPORTANT THINGS.
You just now put solar panels on your roof. Carter did it 30 years ago. Think about that.
Furthermore, praising the NYT obscures a reality that we on the left MUST essentially face AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. WE must establish our own newspaper with its own international staff, a staff capable of overwhelming the miniscule staffs hired by even the NYT. We CAN do this. Much of the infrastructure is in place. The Nation. IPS. Global Research. Nader's call for local Congressional watchdogs. IF we determined to do it, we could create a news service that would dwarf the corporatistic dinosaurs. And we MUST DO IT.
Praising the NYT does nothign but harm. If they report some legitimate news, fine, pass it along. But I ask that you not praise an organization that has proven itself over and over again to be corrupt to the bone.
Just the network of progressive politians nationally putting together a newsletter could be a start. A tremendous start. How many reporters would that be right there?
We all do what we are able in the time frame we are able. That is the reason for solar today and not 30 years ago in my life. All is about timing.
Agreed, we need some form of Progressive news outlet. How do we make that happen?
Peace.
Listen, I'm not ribbing you about the solar and you should know that. You know damn well I've praised you to the skies for it. What I AM saying is that you should pay tribute again and again to the fact that Carter preceded you by 30 years. Can you not see the value of that? You heard of the movie "Girl Interrupted"? Well this is the movie "Solar Interrupted".
How? You ask me how? I told you how. The beginnings of a pubication that could make the NYT look like the crap it is are already there. Znet. IPS. Global Research. NOT DAILY EFFING CIA KOS. Sorry, bud, I know you like the place, but it's a CIA front and one day you'll get it.
But for starters, I say hook up with progressives you admire (whether Dem or not). Put out a newspaper. I don't care if you have to use an old mimeograph machine someone found in a basement. Just do it. Separately, you are a bunch of twigs. Together, you are a movement.
Hey, and if you don't like my input, tell me to get lost. You know my blog. Just go over there and tell me to fuck off. You're a big boy. I know you can do that, Quaker or not.
Post a Comment